Borrow Aggressively, Simplify Relentlessly

Borrow Aggressively, Simplify Relentlessly

Part 7 of 8 in Total Competition Series: Building an Operating System for Winning Under Pressure.

This article is part of our Total Competition series, where we translate Formula One lessons into something racers, builders, track-day regulars, and motorsport enthusiasts can actually use. If you care about pit wall calls, setup changes, team dynamics, and engineering tradeoffs, this series is for you.

Once the operating core is in place, the next question is how it learns and evolves. This part of the series is about the design principles of the system itself: learn fast, copy what works, and resist complexity that does not earn its place.

Many teams say they want innovation when what they really want is originality with their name on it.

That sounds admirable and often performs terribly.

One of the clearest lessons in Total Competition is that high-performing organizations do two things well at the same time:

  • they adopt useful ideas quickly
  • they resist unnecessary complexity

That combination is rarer than it should be.

Stop romanticizing reinvention

The book is blunt on this point. If something works elsewhere, learn from it. Borrow the method, the process, the structure, the idea, or the practice. Do it fast.

This is not an argument for theft or for ignoring intellectual property. It is an argument against ego. Organizations waste huge amounts of time "making it their own" when the real value was already visible.

Leaders should be suspicious when teams respond to an external best practice with some version of:

  • "That would not work here."
  • "We should build our own version."
  • "We already do something similar."

Sometimes those objections are right. Often they are defense mechanisms for status and identity.

Complexity is expensive in ways leaders miss

The simplicity chapter makes a strong engineering point with broad relevance: more complex solutions create more unintended consequences.

They are harder to build.

They are harder to maintain.

They are harder to explain.

They often cost more than their incremental gain is worth.

This is true in product, org design, reporting, and process. Complexity usually arrives dressed as sophistication. It flatters the people who created it. Then it taxes everyone else.

Good operators know that simplicity is not the absence of thought. It is the result of disciplined thought.

Innovation needs conditions, not slogans

Another useful tension in the book is that people innovate naturally when the environment is right.

That means leaders do not manufacture creativity directly. They create the conditions under which creativity can show up:

  • clear goals
  • enough time
  • the right tools
  • confidence that the work matters
  • steady backing from leadership
  • review loops that keep projects on track

This is why innovation cultures often disappoint. They ask for breakthroughs while starving teams of focus, patience, or air cover.

Adversity can be an advantage

Brawn's view that adversity can become opportunity is especially strong. Difficult constraints force sharper thinking. Complicated race weekends, awkward logistics, or disruptive rule changes can all become openings if one team handles them better than the others.

That is a helpful correction to the usual leadership instinct. When friction appears, many teams treat it only as a burden. Better teams ask a second question: if this is hard for us, is it even harder for everyone else?

Sometimes the advantage is not invention from scratch. It is superior adaptation.

A practical operating rule

Taken together, the lesson is simple:

  • borrow proven ideas without vanity
  • simplify wherever complexity is not paying rent
  • create the conditions for intelligent people to do strong work

Leaders who do that build organizations that move faster and waste less motion. They also increase the odds that real innovation appears, because the system is no longer clogged with ego projects and avoidable complication.

Originality is overrated. Effective learning plus disciplined simplification is usually the better competitive edge.


Source book: Total Competition by Ross Brawn and Adam Parr.


Read the full Total Competition Series: Building an Operating System for Winning Under Pressure

  1. Part 1: Strategy Is a System, Not a Pep Talk
  2. Part 2: Win Before the Race Starts
  3. Part 3: Trust, Humility, and the Culture That Wins Under Pressure
  4. Part 4: Know Yourself, Know the Other, and Pick the Right Battles
  5. Part 5: Time Is a Resource, Not Just a Constraint
  6. Part 6: Build a Complete Process and the Product Will Follow
  7. Part 7: Borrow Aggressively, Simplify Relentlessly
  8. Part 8: Use Data Ruthlessly, But Leave Room for Judgement
Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.